Technology and General Blog

Git files and folders of any git job can be shared by several git customers who are get the job done on a workforce. When multiple end users attempt to operate on the identical file or folder, then conflict occurs. Suppose, when the two people are functioning on the exact same file of a repository, and if a person person modifies the file right after the modification done by yet another user, then the modification completed by the to start with person will be misplaced by the previous update. This problem can be solved manually. The person has to git force pull for overwriting the alterations in the nearby repository devoid of influencing the adjustments finished in the neighborhood repository that are not pushed. `git pull` command is not capable to solve this dilemma. The way to use git drive pull by `git fetch` and `git reset` instructions have shown in this tutorial.


Install GitHub Desktop

GitHub Desktop assists the git user to execute the git-associated responsibilities graphically. You can easily download the hottest installer of this application for Ubuntu from You have to put in and configure this application soon after down load to use it. You can also look at the tutorial for setting up GitHub Desktop on Ubuntu to know the installation process properly.

Make a GitHub account

You will have to have to create a GitHub account to check out the commands utilised in this tutorial.

Develop a area and distant repository

You have to generate a nearby repository and publish the repository in the remote server to take a look at the commands employed in this tutorial.

Overwrite neighborhood changes for forcing git pull:

The `git fetch –all` command downloads all material of the remote repository into the local repository but does not merge the content material with the neighborhood repository. After executing the fetch command, if the `git reset` command is executed with the –hard solution, then all the matching information and folders of the regional repository will be overwritten by the written content of the distant repository. All the uncommitted and committed local improvements that are not pushed will be deleted for the –hard possibility. This dilemma has been described in this section of the tutorial by working with a nearby repository named python published right before in the remote server.

Open up the file from the distant repository to test the articles of the file. The following image demonstrates that the file incorporates four lines of script to include two numbers.

Force git pull for uncommitted changes:

Now, open the file of the area repository in any textual content editor and modify the file with the subsequent material. Help you save the file and stop from the editor.

print(“Adding 3 numbers”)

Run the pursuing instructions to include the modified file in the community repository and verify the repository status.

$ git add
$ git position

The next output will seem immediately after executing the command. The output demonstrates that the job is not committed however.

Run the pursuing instructions to test the content of the file just before pulling the content material of the remote repository and test the articles of the soon after pulling forcefully.

$ cat
$ git fetch –all
$ git reset –really hard origin/major
$ cat

The adhering to output reveals that the articles of the file has been overwritten by the material of the file of the distant server, and the modified content material has been misplaced.

Pressure git pull for dedicated modifications:

All over again, open up the file of the area repository in any text editor and modify the file with the next information. Preserve the file and give up from the editor.

print(“Subtracting two numbers”)
a = 50
b = 20
print(a – b)

Run the subsequent commands to insert the modified file in the local repository, dedicate the job and verify the repository position.

$ git include
$ git dedicate -m “ has updated”
$ git position

The subsequent output shows that the modified file is included and fully commited with a commit information. The existing doing work tree is clean up now.

Run the preceding instructions again to verify how the `git reset` command functions for the fully commited endeavor.

$ cat
$ git fetch –all
$ git reset –hard origin/main
$ cat

The adhering to output exhibits that the distant file’s articles has overwritten the written content of the community file once again. So, the `git reset` command operates the same for both of those dedicated and uncommitted duties.

Help save community adjustments in advance of forcing git pull:

The overwriting challenge can be solved by generating a new branch. Dedicate all alterations to the repository prior to managing the pull commands. Again, open up the file of the nearby repository in any text editor and modify the file with the subsequent articles. Help save the file and stop from the editor.

print(“Multiply two numbers”)
print(a * b)

Run the next instructions to check the branch list, switch to a new branch, and test the content material of the file right after executing the pull commands.

$ git branch
$ git checkout -b new-branch
$ git fetch –all
$ git reset –challenging origin/major
$ cat

The subsequent output reveals that the information of the file has overwritten for the new branch.

Now, Operate the pursuing instructions to look at the material of the file following switching to the most important branch.

$ git checkout major
$ cat

The subsequent output displays that the articles of the has remained unchanged.


The trouble of pulling the git repository forcefully and how to address this difficulty has been explained in this tutorial by employing a neighborhood and distant demo repository. But this solution will not operate for the uncommitted alterations of the neighborhood repository. So, you have to commit all modifications or run the `git stash` command right before pulling the git repository forcefully.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *